X

Selection for the Position of a Local Court Judge: Results of the Testing of General Knowledge in the Field of Law and Specialisation of Local Commercial Court

05.09.2025

Please be informed, that the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine has completed testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of local commercial court, which lasted from August 11 to 13, 2025.

I. Composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam – testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local commercial court.

A total of 2,237 persons were admitted to the testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local commercial court:

local court judges – 118:

judges of administrative courts – 4;

judges of commercial courts – 7;

judges of general courts – 107;

candidates for the position of judge – 2,119:

court staff – 648;

Prosecutor’s Office employees – 463;

attorneys– 312;

military personnel – 90;

representatives of other professions – 606.

Gender composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local commercial court)

 

 

No

Place of work

Women

(persons)

Men

(persons)

TOTAL

1.

Local court judges

61

57

118

1.1.

Judges of administrative courts

2

2

4

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

2

5

7

1.3.

Judges of general courts

57

50

107

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

1073

1046

2119

2.1.

Court staff

421

227

648

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

207

256

463

2.3.

Attorneys

142

170

312

2.4.

Military personnel

3

87

90

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

300

306

606

TOTAL

1134

1103

2237

 

The overall gender balance of test participants remains relatively even:

women — 51%,

men — 49%.

There is an even gender balance among the participants in the selection process – 49% men and 51% women, and among the judges as well – 48% men and 52% women.

 The highest rate of female participation was recorded among court staff — 65%; the highest percentage of men — among military personnel (97%).

There is a relative gender balance in the categories of attorneys, Prosecutor’s Office employees and representatives of other professions.

Overall, the results indicate an appropriate level of gender representation in the selection procedure.

Age composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam –  (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local commercial court)

* age at the time of submitting documents for participation in the selection

No.

Place of work

From 30

To 35 years old

(persons*)

From 36

To 40 years old

(persons*)

41 years and older

 (persons*)

TOTAL

1.

Local court judges

0

47

71

118

1.1.

Judges of administrative courts

0

4

0

4

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

4

3

7

1.3.

Judges of general courts

0

39

68

107

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

846

741

532

2119

2.1.

Court staff

290

236

122

648

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

220

150

93

463

2.3.

Attorneys

110

106

96

312

2.4.

Military personnel

26

35

29

90

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

200

214

192

606

TOTAL

846

788

603

2237

 

 Local court judges who intend to be transferred to another local court are mostly over 40 years old (60%), there are no judges younger than 36. This trend is justified by the long break in the possibility of exercising a judges right to transfer to another local court.

Among the candidates for the position of judge, almost half  of them (40%) are persons aged 30–35, and 75% of candidates are younger than 41.

Courts staff and Prosecutors office employees are the youngest categories: aged 30–35 — 45% and 48%, respectively.

Attorneyes, military personnel and other professions have a relatively even distribution of age groups.

Regional composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local commercial court)

No.

Region

Judges

(persons)

Candidates for the position of judge (individuals)

TOTAL

Сourt apparatus

Prosecutor's Office employees

Attorneys

Military personnel

Other professions

Total

1

Vinnytsia

Oblast

4

13

14

10

4

16

57

61

2

Volyn

Oblast

4

16

15

8

0

23

62

66

3

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

13

36

44

24

3

54

161

174

4

Donetsk

Oblast

4

1

1

0

0

1

3

7

5

Zhytomyr

Oblast

6

10

23

8

1

6

48

54

6

Transcarpathian

Oblast

3

19

9

6

0

17

51

54

7

Zaporizhzhia

Oblast

4

11

22

9

4

19

65

69

8

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast

5

15

21

7

1

20

64

69

9

Kyiv

Oblast

6

47

13

26

9

48

143

149

10

Kirovohrad Oblast

6

19

7

5

2

8

41

47

11

Luhansk

Oblast

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

12

Lviv

Oblast

2

72

43

27

8

54

204

206

13

Mykolaiv

Oblast

3

5

10

4

1

7

27

30

14

Odesa

Oblast

6

31

36

25

7

42

141

147

15

Poltava

Oblast

6

12

19

10

4

21

66

72

16

Rivne

Oblast

3

46

16

19

5

22

108

111

17

Sumy

Oblast

2

18

19

9

2

18

66

68

18

Ternopil Oblast

6

7

6

7

0

18

38

44

19

Kharkiv

Oblast

8

63

27

15

5

30

140

148

20

Kherson

Oblast

3

1

3

1

1

3

9

12

21

Khmelnytskyi

Oblast

1

15

11

6

3

10

45

46

22

Cherkasy

Oblast

5

9

4

13

2

15

43

48

23

Chernivtsi

Oblast

3

5

8

3

2

6

24

27

24

Chernihiv

Oblast

6

15

21

8

2

11

57

63

25

Kyiv City

5

162

71

62

24

135

454

459

26

another country

0

0

0

0

0

2

2

2

TOTAL

118

648

463

312

90

606

2119

2 237

The city of Kyiv confidently leads in the number of people wishing to become judges —21% of all participants.

The largest participation of candidates for the position of judge was provided by the city of Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Lviv, Kharkiv, Kyiv and Odesa Oblasts – together over 63% of the total number of candidates.

 II. Success rate of passing the testing of general knowledge in the field of law and  specialisation of  the local commercial court

835 persons, or 37% of the total number of participants, did not appear for the test:

  1. Local general court judges – 35 persons, or 30% of the total number of persons in this group;
  2. Candidates for the position of judge – 800 persons, or 38% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • court staff – 201 personss, or 31% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • Prosecutor’s Office employees – 232 persons, or 50% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • attorneys – 103 persons, or 33% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • representatives of other professions – 235 persons, or 39% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • military personnel – 29 persons, or 32% of the total number of persons in this group.

The minimum acceptable test score is 75 points, or 112,5 points in case of applying the 1.5 coeficient.

The maximum test score is 100 points or 150 points in case of applying the 1.5 coeficient.

Success rate of the second stage of the qualification exam

“Testing of general knowledge in the field of law and  specialisation of  the local commercial court”

No.

Place of work

74 points or less (or less than 111 points when applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 75 to 93 points (or from 112.5 to 139.5 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 94 to 97 points (or from 141 to 145.5 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 98 to 100 points (or from 147 to 150 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

TOTAL

persons

%*

persons

%*

persons

%*

persons

%*

persons

%*

1.

Local court judges

0

0,0%

10

12,0%

19

22,9%

54

65,1%

83

100,0%

1.1.

Judges of administrative courts

0

0,0%

1

25,0%

1

25,0%

2

50,0%

4

100,0%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

0,0%

2

28,6%

1

14,3%

4

57,1%

7

100,0%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

0

0,0%

7

9,7%

17

23,6%

48

66,7%

72

100,0%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

39

3,0%

307

23,3%

276

20,9%

697

52,8%

1319

100,0%

2.1.

Court staff

6

1,3%

99

22,1%

88

19,7%

254

56,8%

447

33,9%

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

5

2,2%

46

19,9%

41

17,7%

139

60,2%

231

17,5%

2.3.

Attorneys

3

1,4%

51

24,4%

51

24,4%

104

49,8%

209

15,8%

2.4.

Military personnel

1

1,6%

18

29,5%

19

31,1%

23

37,7%

61

4,6%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

24

6,5%

93

25,1%

77

20,8%

177

47,7%

371

28,1%

TOTAL

39

2,8%

317

22,6%

295

21,0%

751

53,6%

1402

100,0%

In accordance with the decision of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine dated May 12, 2025, No. 105/zp-25, the passing score for the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the relevant court) is determined on the basis that candidates admitted to the third stage are those who have scored not less than 75 percent of the maximum possible score, in a number three times greater than the projected number of vacant judicial positions in local courts, namely: 600 – in local commercial courts.

If two or more candidates for the position of judge receive the same lowest passing score of the second stage of the qualification exam, all such candidates shall be admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam.

Based on the results of the second stage of the qualification exam – testing of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the local commercial court – by decision of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine dated August 15, 2025,
751 persons were admitted to the third stage.

III. Composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam –  testing of cognitive abilities (local commercial court specialisation)

A total of 751 persons were admitted to testing of cognitive abilities (local commercial court specialisation)

 1) by the composition of the participants:

a) judges of local courts – 54:

- judges of administrative courts – 2;

- judges of commercial courts – 4;

- judges of general courts – 48;

b) candidates for the position of judge – 697:

- court staff – 254;

- prosecutors office employees – 139;

- attorneys104;

- representatives of other professions – 177;

- military personnel – 23.

Gender composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam testing of cognitive abilities (local commercial court specialisation)

No

Place of work

Women

Men

TOTAL

persons

%*

persons

%*

persons

%*

1.

Local court judges

31

57%

23

43%

54

100%

1.1.

Judges of administrative courts

1

50%

1

50%

2

4%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

1

25%

3

75%

4

7%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

29

60%

19

40%

48

89%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

370

53%

327

47%

697

100%

2.1.

Court staff

157

62%

97

38%

254

36%

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

73

53%

66

47%

139

20%

2.3.

Attorneys

47

45%

57

55%

104

15%

2.4.

Military personnel

2

9%

21

91%

23

3%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

91

51%

86

49%

177

25%

TOTAL

401

53%

350

47%

751

100%

Among the participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam, there is a higher percentage of women:

women — 401 persons, or 53% of the total number of participants;

men — 350 persons, or 47% of the total number of participants.

The highest rate of female participation was recorded among court staff — 62% and judges – 57%; the highest percentage of men — among military personnel (91%) and attorneys (55 %).

There is a relative gender balance in the categories of Prosecutor’s office employees and representatives of other professions.

Overall, the results indicate an appropriate level of gender representation in the selection procedure.

 

Age composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam testing of cognitive abilities (local commercial court specialisation)

* age at the time of submitting documents for participation in the selection

No

Place of work

From 30

to 35 years old

From 36

to 40 years old

41 years and older

TOTAL

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

1.

Local court judges

0

0%

22

41%

32

59%

54

100%

1.1.

Judges of administrative courts

0

0%

2

100%

0

0%

2

4%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

0%

2

50%

2

50%

4

7%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

0

0%

18

37%

30

63%

48

89%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

298

43%

241

35%

158

23%

697

100%

2.1.

Court staff

118

46%

99

39%

37

15%

254

36%

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

70

50%

43

31%

26

19%

139

20%

2.3.

Attorneys

43

41%

34

33%

27

26%

104

15%

2.4.

Military personnel

10

43%

6

26%

7

30%

23

3%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

57

32%

59

33%

61

34%

177

25%

TOTAL

298

40%

263

35%

190

25%

751

100%

Local court judges who intend to be transferred to another local court are mostly over 40 years old (59%), there are no judges younger than 36 years old among them.

Among candidates for the position of judge, 77% are younger than 41 years old.

Courts staff employees, Prosecutors Office employees, attorneys and military personnel are the youngest categories: aged 30–35 — 46%, 50%, 41% and 43 % respectively.

Other professions representatives have a relatively even distribution of age groups.

Regional composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification examtesting of cognitive abilities (local commercial court specialisation)

 

Regional composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and court specialisations)

No.

Region

Judges

Candidates for the position of judge (persons)

TOTAL

(persons)

Court apparatus

Prosecutors Office

Attorneyes

Military personnel

Other professions

Total

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

1

Vinnytsia Oblast

1

6,3%

5

33,3%

3

20,0%

2

13,3%

1

6,7%

4

26,7%

15

94%

16

2,1%

2

Volyn Oblast

3

12,5%

6

28,6%

7

33,3%

3

14,3%

0

0,0%

5

23,8%

21

88%

24

3,2%

3

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

2

2,8%

18

26,1%

16

23,2%

11

15,9%

1

1,4%

23

33,3%

69

97%

71

9,5%

4

Donetsk Oblast

1

100,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0%

1

0,1%

5

Zhytomyr Oblast

2

10,5%

4

23,5%

8

47,1%

3

17,6%

0

0,0%

2

11,8%

17

89%

19

2,5%

6

Transcarpathian Oblast

1

4,3%

9

40,9%

5

22,7%

2

9,1%

0

0,0%

6

27,3%

22

96%

23

3,1%

7

Zaporizhzhia Oblast

0

0,0%

1

6,7%

5

33,3%

3

20,0%

0

0,0%

6

40,0%

15

100%

15

2,0%

8

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast

4

20,0%

6

37,5%

6

37,5%

3

18,8%

0

0,0%

1

6.3%

16

80%

20

2,7%

9

Kyiv Oblast

5

8,9%

19

37,3%

6

11,8%

10

19,6%

1

2,0%

15

29,4%

51

91%

56

7,5%

10

Kirovohrad Oblast

1

10,0%

6

66,7%

1

11,1%

0

0,0%

1

11,1%

1

11,1%

9

90%

10

1,3%

11

Luhansk Oblast

1

100,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0%

1

0,1%

12

Lviv Oblast

0

0,0%

29

40,3%

8

11,1%

13

18,1%

2

2,8%

20

27,8%

72

100%

72

9,6%

13

Mykolaiv Oblast

1

12,5%

1

14,3%

2

28,6%

1

14,3%

0

0,0%

3

42,9%

7

88%

8

1,1%

14

Odesa Oblast

2

3,4%

17

29,8%

11

19,3%

9

15,8%

3

5,3%

17

29,8%

57

97%

59

7,9%

15

Poltava Oblast

6

23,1%

1

5,0%

7

35,0%

2

10,0%

3

15,0%

7

35,0%

20

77%

26

3,5%

16

Rivne Oblast

1

2,8%

17

48,6%

8

22,9%

3

8,6%

1

2,9%

6

17,1%

35

97%

36

4,8%

17

Sumy Oblast

2

11,8%

2

13,3%

7

46,7%

2

13,3%

0

0,0%

4

26,7%

15

88%

17

2,3%

18

Ternopil Oblast

3

25,0%

1

11,1%

1

11,1%

2

22,2%

0

0,0%

5

55,6%

9

75%

12

1,6%

19

Kharkiv Oblast

6

10,2%

31

58,5%

12

22,6%

3

5,7%

1

1,9%

6

11,3%

53

90%

59

7,9%

20

Kherson Oblast

1

33,3%

1

50,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

1

50,0%

2

67%

3

0,4%

21

Khmelnytskyi Oblast

0

0,0%

4

30,8%

3

23,1%

2

15,4%

1

7,7%

3

23,1%

13

100%

13

1,7%

22

Cherkasy Oblast

3

20,0%

3

25,0%

1

8,3%

3

25,0%

1

8,3%

4

33,3%

12

80%

15

2,0%

23

Chernivtsi Oblast

2

33,3%

1

25,0%

1

25,0%

1

25,0%

1

25,0%

0

0,0%

4

67%

6

0,8%

24

Chernihiv Oblast

3

17,6%

3

21,4%

6

42,9%

2

14,3%

0

0,0%

3

21,4%

14

82%

17

2,3%

25

Kyiv City

3

2,0%

69

46,6%

15

10,1%

24

16,2%

6

4,1%

34

23,0%

148

98%

151

20,1%

26

another country

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

1

100,0%

1

100%

1

0,1%

TOTAL

54

7,2%

254

36,4%

139

19,9%

104

14,9%

23

3,3%

177

25,4%

697

93%

751

100,%