X

Selection for the Position of a Local Court Judge: Results of the Testing of General Knowledge in the Field of Law and Specialisation of Local General Court

05.09.2025

Please be informed, that the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine has completed testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of local general court, which lasted from August 14 to 26, 2025.

I. Composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam – testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local general court.

A total of 6 754 persons were admitted to the testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local general court:

  1. local court judges – 402:
  • judges of administrative courts – 4;
  • judges of commercial courts – 1;
  • judges of general courts – 397;
  1. candidates for the position of judge – 6 352:
  • court staff –  2 482;
  • Prosecutor’s Office employees – 1 690;
  • attorneys– 656;
  • military personnel – 213;
  • representatives of other professions – 1 311.

Gender composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local general court)

No.

Place of work

Women

(persons)

Men

(persons)

TOTAL

1.

Local court judges

223

179

402

1.1.

Administrative court judges

3

1

4

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

1

1

1.3.

Judges of general courts

220

177

397

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

3346

3006

6352

2.1.

Court staff

1725

757

2482

2.2.

Prosecutor's Office employees

636

1054

1690

2.3.

Attorneys

330

326

656

2.4.

Military personnel

10

203

213

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

645

666

1311

TOTAL

3569

3185

6754

 

The overall gender balance of test participants remains relatively even:

women — 53%,

men — 47%.

There is an even gender balance among the participants in the selection process – 47% men and 53% women, and among the judges 55% men and 45% women.

 The highest rate of female participation was recorded among court staff — 70%; the highest percentage of men — among military personnel (95%) and prosecutors (62%).

There is a relative gender balance in the categories of attorneys and representatives of other professions.

Overall, the results indicate an appropriate level of gender representation in the selection procedure.

Age composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam –  testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local general court

* age at the time of submitting documents for participation in the selection

No. of the company

Place of work

From 30

to 35 years old

(persons*)

From 36

to 40 years old

(persons*)

41 years and older

 (persons*)

TOTAL

1.

Local court judges

0

136

266

402

1.1.

Administrative court judges

0

3

1

4

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

1

0

1

1.3.

Judges of general courts

0

132

265

397

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

2712

2098

1542

6352

2.1.

Court staff

1096

872

514

2482

2.2.

Prosecutor's Office employees

848

511

331

1690

2.3.

Attorneys

216

217

223

656

2.4.

Military personnel

70

69

74

213

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

482

429

400

1311

TOTAL

2712

2234

1808

6754

 

 Local court judges who intend to be transferred to another local court are mostly over 40 years old (66%), there are no judges younger than 36. This trend is justified by the long break in the possibility of exercising a judges right to transfer to another local court.

Among the candidates for the position of judge, almost half  of them (43%) are persons aged 30–35, and 76% of candidates are younger than 41.

Courts staff and Prosecutors office employees are the youngest categories: aged 30–35 — 44% and 50%, respectively.

Attorneyes, military personnel and other professions representatives have a relatively even distribution of age groups.

Regional composition of participants admitted to the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and specialisation of the local  general court)

No.

Region

Judges

(persons)

Candidates for the position of judge (persons)

TOTAL

Court staff

Prosecutors Office

employees

Attorneys

Military personnel

Other professions representatives

Total

1

Vinnytsia

Oblast

14

106

78

26

9

51

270

284

2

Volyn

Oblast

9

87

45

20

0

41

193

202

3

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

40

191

244

51

11

93

590

630

4

Donetsk

Oblast

48

20

11

2

2

5

40

88

5

Zhytomyr Oblast

16

92

62

21

8

33

216

232

6

Transcarpathian Oblast

6

55

34

17

2

39

147

153

7

Zaporizhzhia

Oblast

14

63

65

16

5

40

189

203

8

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast

8

69

44

20

4

49

186

194

9

Kyiv Oblast

13

166

70

55

17

107

415

428

10

Kirovohrad Oblast

17

64

59

16

5

31

175

192

11

Luhansk

Oblast

28

0

0

0

0

0

0

28

12

Lviv Oblast

7

203

95

46

17

117

478

485

13

Mykolaiv Oblast

16

69

65

16

5

24

179

195

14

Odesa Oblast

20

128

102

55

22

78

385

405

15

Poltava

Oblast

24

101

65

26

12

60

264

288

16

Rivne

Oblast

12

96

56

34

8

35

229

241

17

Sumy

Oblast

22

66

61

22

4

35

188

210

18

Ternopil Oblast

5

62

33

17

5

31

148

153

19

Kharkiv

Oblast

18

198

96

33

13

83

423

441

20

Kherson

Oblast

9

17

9

0

2

7

35

44

21

Khmelnytskyi

Oblast

10

98

42

10

5

25

180

190

22

Cherkasy

Oblast

11

64

45

29

6

28

172

183

23

Chernivtsi

Oblast

7

53

36

14

3

18

124

131

24

Chernihiv

Oblast

25

54

75

15

8

34

186

211

25

Kyiv City

3

359

198

95

40

244

936

939

26

Another country

0

1

0

0

0

3

4

4

TOTAL

402

2482

1690

656

213

1311

6352

6754

 

The city of Kyiv confidently leads in the number of people wishing to become judges —14% of all participants.

The largest participation of candidates for the position of judge was provided by the city of Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Lviv, Kharkiv, Kyiv and Odesa Oblasts – together over 49% of the total number of candidates.

 II. Success rate of passing the testing of general knowledge in the field of law and  specialisation of  the local general court

279 persons, or 4% of the total number of participants, did not appear for the test:

  1. Local general court judges – 26 persons, or 6% of the total number of persons in this group;
  2. Candidates for the position of judge – 253 persons, or 4% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • court staff – 62 personss, or 2% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • Prosecutor’s Office employees – 83 persons, or 5% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • attorneys – 22 persons, or 3% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • representatives of other professions – 75 persons, or 6% of the total number of persons in this group;
  • military personnel – 11 persons, or 3% of the total number of persons in this group.

The minimum acceptable test score is 75 points, or 112,5 points in case of applying the 1.5 coeficient.

The maximum test score is 100 points or 150 points in case of applying the 1.5 coeficient.

Success rate of the second stage of the qualification exam

Testing of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the local general court

No.

Place of work

74 points or less (or less than 111 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 75 to 89 points (or from 112.5 to 133.5 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 90 to 94 points (or from 135 to 141 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

from 95 to 100 points (or from 142.5 to 150 points applying a coefficient of 1.5)

TOTAL

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

1.

Local court judges

2

0,5%

19

5,1%

29

7,7%

326

86,7%

376

100,0%

1.1.

Administrative court judges

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

4

100,0%

4

100,0%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

1

100,0%

1

100,0%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

2

0,5%

19

5,1%

29

7,8%

321

86,5%

371

100,0%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

73

1,2%

781

12,8%

1082

17,7%

4163

68,3%

6099

462,4%

2.1.

Court staff

24

1,0%

271

11,2%

394

16,3%

1731

71,5%

2420

183,5%

2.2.

Prosecutor's Office employees

11

0,7%

172

10,7%

288

17,9%

1136

70,7%

1607

121,8%

2.3.

Attorneys

6

0,9%

92

14,5%

125

19,7%

411

64,8%

634

48,1%

2.4.

Military personnel

6

3,0%

37

18,3%

44

21,8%

115

56,9%

202

15,3%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

26

2,1%

209

16,9%

231

18,7%

770

62,3%

1236

93,7%

TOTAL

75

1,2%

800

12,4%

1111

17,2%

4489

69,3%

6475

100,0%

 

In accordance with the decision of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine dated May 12, 2025, No. 105/zp-25, the passing score for the second stage of the qualification exam (testing of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the relevant court) is determined on the basis that candidates admitted to the third stage are those who have scored not less than 75 percent of the maximum possible score, in a number three times greater than the projected number of vacant judicial positions in local courts, namely: 4 200 – in local general courts.

If two or more candidates for the position of judge receive the same lowest passing score of the second stage of the qualification exam, all such candidates shall be admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam.

Based on the results of the second stage of the qualification exam – testing of general knowledge in the field of law and knowledge of the specialisation of the local general court – by decision of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine dated August 27, 2025, 4 489 persons were admitted to the third stage.

III. Composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam –  testing of cognitive abilities (local general court specialisation)

A total of 4 489 persons were admitted to testing of cognitive abilities (local general court specialisation)

 1) by the composition of the participants:

a) judges of local courts – 326:

- judges of administrative courts – 4;

- judges of commercial courts – 1;

- judges of general courts – 321;

b) candidates for the position of judge – 4 163:

- court staff – 1 731;

- prosecutors office employees – 1 136;

- attorneys411;

- representatives of other professions – 770;

- military personnel – 115.

Gender composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam testing of cognitive abilities (local general court specialisation)

No.

Place of work

Women

Men

TOTAL

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

1.

Local court judges

183

56%

143

44%

326

100%

1.1.

Administrative court judges

3

75%

1

25%

4

1%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

0%

1

100%

1

0%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

180

56%

141

44%

321

98%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

2231

54%

1932

46%

4163

100%

2.1.

Court staff

1199

69%

532

31%

1731

42%

2.2.

Prosecutors Office employees

431

38%

705

62%

1136

27%

2.3.

Attorneys

211

51%

200

49%

411

10%

2.4.

Military personnel

4

3%

111

97%

115

3%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

386

50%

384

50%

770

18%

TOTAL

2414

54%

2075

46%

4489

100%

 

Among the participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam, there is a higher percentage of women:

women — 2 414 persons, or 54% of the total number of participants;

men — 2 075  persons, or 46% of the total number of participants.

The highest rate of female participation was recorded among court staff — 69% and judges – 56%; the highest percentage of men — among military personnel (97%) and prosecutors (62 %).

There is a relative gender balance in the categories of attorneys and representatives of other professions.

Overall, the results indicate an appropriate level of gender representation in the selection procedure.

Age composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification exam testing of cognitive abilities (local general court specialisation)

* age at the time of submitting documents for participation in the selection

No.

Place of work

From 30

to 35 years old

From 36

to 40 years old

41 years and older

TOTAL

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

persons*

%*

1.

Local court judges

0

0%

115

35%

211

65%

326

100%

1.1.

Administrative court judges

0

0%

3

75%

1

25%

4

1%

1.2.

Judges of commercial courts

0

0%

1

100%

0

0%

1

0%

1.3.

Judges of general courts

0

0%

111

37%

210

65%

321

98%

2.

Candidates for the position of judge

1821

44%

1376

33%

966

23%

4163

100%

2.1.

Court staff

765

44%

623

36%

343

20%

1731

42%

2.2.

Prosecutor's Office employees

590

52%

324

29%

222

20%

1136

27%

2.3.

Attorneys

142

35%

137

33%

132

32%

411

10%

2.4.

Military personnel

41

36%

37

32%

37

32%

115

3%

2.5.

Representatives of other professions

283

37%

255

33%

232

30%

770

18%

TOTAL

1821

41%

1491

33%

1177

26%

4489

100%

 

Local court judges who intend to be transferred to another local court are mostly over 40 years old (65%), there are no judges younger than 36 years old among them.

Among candidates for the position of judge, 77% are younger than 41 years old.

Courts staff employees, Prosecutors Office employees are the youngest categories: aged 30–35 — 44% and 52% respectively.

Attorneys, military personnel and other professions representatives have a relatively even distribution of age groups.

Regional composition of participants admitted to the third stage of the qualification examtesting of cognitive abilities (local general court specialisation)

No.

Region

Judges

Candidates for the position of judge (persons)

TOTAL

(persons)

Court staff

ProsecutorOffice employees

Attorneys

Military personnel

Other professions

Total

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

persons

%

1

Vinnytsia Oblast

10

6,0%

68

43,0%

43

27,2%

9

5,7%

6

3,8%

32

20,3%

158

94%

168

3,74%

2

Volyn Oblast

9

6,4%

60

45,8%

36

27,5%

13

9,9%

0

0,0%

22

16,8%

131

94%

140

3,12%

3

Dnipropetrovsk Oblast

28

6,5%

140

34,8%

167

41,5%

32

8,0%

9

2,2%

54

13,4%

402

93%

430

9,58%

4

Donetsk Oblast

38

60,3%

13

0,0%

8

0,0%

1

0,0%

2

0,0%

1

0,0%

25

40%

63

1,40%

5

Zhytomyr Oblast

12

7,9%

63

45,3%

37

26,6%

16

11,5%

3

2,2%

20

14,4%

139

92%

151

3,36%

6

Transcarpathian Oblast

6

5,1%

44

39,3%

27

24,1%

11

9,8%

2

1,8%

28

25,0%

112

95%

118

2,63%

7

Zaporizhia Oblast

12

10,4%

35

34,0%

38

36,9%

9

8,7%

0

0,0%

21

20,4%

103

90%

115

2,56%

8

Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast

7

5,3%

52

41,3%

33

26,2%

14

11,1%

0

0,0%

27

21,4%

126

95%

133

2,96%

9

Kyiv Oblast

10

3,8%

111

44,4%

45

18,0%

27

10,8%

9

3,6%

58

23,2%

250

96%

260

5,79%

10

Kirovohrad Oblast

14

10,2%

50

40,7%

45

36,6%

8

6,5%

2

1,6%

18

14,6%

123

90%

137

3,05%

11

Luhansk Oblast

25

100,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0%

25

0,56%

12

Lviv Oblast

6

1,7%

152

44,7%

69

20,3%

35

10,3%

8

2,4%

76

22,4%

340

98%

346

7,71%

13

Mykolaiv Oblast

12

9,0%

47

38,8%

46

38,0%

13

10,7%

1

0,8%

14

11,6%

121

91%

133

2,96%

14

Odesa Oblast

16

6,2%

84

34,6%

66

27,2%

38

15,6%

11

4,5%

44

18,1%

243

94%

259

5,77%

15

Poltava Oblast

23

10,8%

75

39,7%

47

24,9%

19

10,1%

8

4,2%

40

21,2%

189

89%

212

4,72%

16

Rivne Oblast

9

5,7%

68

45,6%

40

26,8%

17

11,4%

5

3,4%

19

12,8%

149

94%

158

3,52%

17

Sumy Oblast

18

12,3%

46

35,9%

42

32,8%

18

14,1%

1

0,8%

21

16,4%

128

88%

146

3,25%

18

Ternopil Oblast

4

3,8%

44

43,1%

29

28,4%

12

11,8%

4

3,9%

13

12,7%

102

96%

106

2,36%

19

Kharkiv Oblast

12

4,2%

137

49,6%

66

23,9%

21

7,6%

8

2,9%

44

15,9%

276

96%

288

6,42%

20

Kherson Oblast

8

26,7%

11

50,0%

9

40,9%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

2

9,1%

22

73%

30

0,67%

21

Khmelnytskyi Oblast

10

7,6%

65

53,7%

27

22,3%

8

6,6%

2

1,7%

19

15,7%

121

92%

131

2,92%

22

Cherkasy Oblast

11

9,6%

43

41,3%

28

26,9%

15

14,4%

3

2,9%

15

14,4%

104

90%

115

2,56%

23

Chernivtsi Oblast

5

5,3%

40

44,4%

27

30,0%

11

12,2%

2

2,2%

10

11,1%

90

95%

95

2,12%

24

Chernihiv Oblast

18

12,5%

38

30,2%

53

42,1%

7

5,6%

5

4,0%

23

18,3%

126

88%

144

3,21%

25

Kyiv City

3

0,5%

244

42,0%

108

18,6%

57

9,8%

24

4,1%

148

25,5%

581

99%

584

13,01%

26

Another country

0

0,0%

1

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

0

0,0%

1

50,0%

2

100%

2

0,04%

TOTAL

326

7,3%

1731

41,6%

1136

27,3%

411

9,9%

115

2,8%

770

18,5%

4163

93%

4489

100,00%